Causal Induction Enables Adaptive Decision Making
نویسنده
چکیده
The present paper examines the interplay between causal reasoning and decision making. We use a repeated decision making paradigm to investigate how people adapt their choice behavior when being confronted with changes in the decision environment. We argue that people are sensitive to the causal texture of a decision problem and adjust their choice behavior in accordance with their causal beliefs. In the first study we examine how people adapt their decision making behavior when new options whose consequences have not been observed yet become available. In the second study the causal system underlying the decision problem is modified to investigate how prior experiences with the choice task affect decision making. The results show that decision makers’ choice behavior is strongly contingent on their causal beliefs and that they exploit their causal knowledge to assess the consequences of changes in the decision problem situation. A high consistency between hypotheses about causal structure, expected values, and actual choices was observed.
منابع مشابه
Causal Learning through Repeated Decision Making
Many decisions refer to actions that have a causal impact on other events. Such actions allow for mere learning of expected values, but also for causal learning about the structure of the decision context. Whereas most theories of decision making neglect causal knowledge, causal learning theories emphasize the importance of causal beliefs and assume that people represent decision problems in te...
متن کاملCausal Inference in Conjoint Analysis : Understanding Multidimensional Choices via
Survey experiments are a core tool for causal inference. Yet, the design of classical survey experiments prevents them from identifying which components of a multidimensional treatment are influential. Here, we show how conjoint analysis, an experimental design yet to be widely applied in political science, enables researchers to estimate the causal effects of multiple treatment components and ...
متن کاملCausal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments
Survey experiments are a core tool for causal inference. Yet, the design of classical survey experiments prevents them from identifying which components of a multidimensional treatment are influential. Here, we show how conjoint analysis, an experimental design yet to be widely applied in political science, enables researchers to estimate the causal effects of multiple treatment components and ...
متن کاملAdaptive Decision Fusion in Detection Networks
In a detection
 network, the final decision is made by fusing the decisions from local detectors. The objective of that decision is to minimize the final error probability. To implement and optimal fusion rule, the performance of each detector, i.e. its probability of false alarm and its probability of missed detection as well as the a priori probabilities of the hypotheses, must be known. H...
متن کاملAdaptive Decision Fusion in Detection Networks
In a detection network, the final decision is made by fusing the decisions from local detectors. The objective of that decision is to minimize the final error probability. To implement and optimal fusion rule, the performance of each detector, i.e. its probability of false alarm and its probability of missed detection as well as the a priori probabilities of the hypotheses, must be known. How...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009